The earth is full. It’s full of us, full of our stuff, full of our waste, full of our demands; yes, we are a brilliant and creative species, but we’ve created a little too much stuff—so much that our economy is now bigger than it’s host, our planet…”
– Paul Gilding, independent writer and adviser on sustainability.
The above and following quotes are from Gilding’s TED talk on sustainability.
A Familiar Message With Little Regard Given To It
It is nothing new that advocates and scientists are warning that consumption is out of control on our planet. However, little is done to educate us, the various populaces of the planet, that our current levels of consumption are detrimental to the future survival of our species, other species, and the planet as a whole.
As Gilding says,
We’re burning through our capital, or, stealing from the future… what this means is our economy is unsustainable … when things aren’t sustainable they stop.”
In Love With A Crazy Idea
When we think about economic growth stopping we go, ‘that’s not possible,’ because economic growth is so essential to our society that it is really questioned… it is based on a crazy idea, the crazy idea being that we can have infinite growth on a finite planet… I’m here to tell you the Emperor has no clothes, that the crazy idea is just that: It is crazy.”
Gilding states a counter argument:
But we need growth. We need it to solve poverty. We need it to develop technology. We need it to keep social stability.”
His reply:
I find this argument fascinating, as though, we can kind of bend the rules of physics to suit our needs… the earth doesn’t care what we need. Mother nature doesn’t negotiate. She just sets rules and describes consequences and these are not esoteric limits. This is about food and water, soil and climate, the basic practical and economic foundations of our lives.”
The Specifics Of The Growth Crisis
Many of you will be thinking: ‘But surely we can still stop this. If it’s that bad, we’ll react.’ Let’s just think through that idea.
We’ve had 50 years of warnings.
- We’ve had science proving the urgency of change.
- We’ve had economic analysis pointing out that not only can we afford it, it’s cheaper to act early.
- And yet the reality is we’ve done pretty much nothing to change course. We’re not even slowing down.”
We’re not acting. We’re not close to acting. And we’re not going to act until this crisis hits the economy and that’s why the end of growth is the central issue and the event that we need to get ready for.”
Here is Gilding’s full TED talk [17 min.]:
The Lack Of An Integral Perspective
So, when does this transition begin, when does this breakdown begin? In my view it is well underway. I know most people don’t see it that way. We tend to look at the world, not as the integral system that it is, but as a serious of individual issues.
We see mistakenly each of these issues as individual problems to be solved. In fact, it’s a system in the painful process of breaking down.”
Change Takes Everyone Working Together
We are more than capable of getting through everything that’s coming… when we feel fear and we feel loss; we are capable of quite extraordinary things… There’s certainly no economic or technical barrier in the way… the only thing we need to change is how we think and how we feel and this is where you come in… we can be more. We can be much more.
… We can choose this moment of crisis to ask and answer the big questions of society’s evolution. Like, what do we want to be when we grow up when we move past this bumbling adolescence when we think there are no limits and suffer illusions of immortality?
… We can do what we need to do but it will take… every one of us. This could be our finest hour.”
Image: “Built for collapse” by Danny Birchall on Flickr.
The completer the cooperation, the greater the vitality; the more imperfect the cooperation, the less the vitality. Now, a body, the various parts of which are so interdependent that without coordination vitality is reduced or death ensues, must be regarded, in so far as the functions in question are concerned, not as a collection of rival organisms, but as one. This is in accord with what we know of the character of living organisms in their conflict with environment.”
