Game Over

Imagine you turn on your TV and hear a news man say: “Congratulations, fellow Americans: the era of rampant consumption has come to an end!”  The comments would probably be diverse: “No way, we are getting back in the game!”, “I didn’t expect it to be today…”, “Somebody finally said it straight!” But if I were you, I’d stop watching TV altogether.

So, is the game over? Yes, it is.  Why is the truth always so daunting? Why is it so difficult for us to acknowledge something that has been staring us in the face for a while now? We may be legally blind, but even they can see elephants.

The World Wildlife Fund scientists, who work with governments, businesses and communities around the world, based on their practical experience, knowledge and credibility, claim that today humans are consuming over 25% more natural resources on a global scale than the earth can support and that this rampant consumption is stretching ecological boundaries, leading to unsustainable living.

WWF-UK’s Head of Research, Stuart Bond, said humanity has been living off its “ecological credit card” and “liquidating the planet’s natural resources. While this can be done for a short while, ecological debt ultimately leads to the depletion of resources, such as forests, oceans and agricultural land, upon which our economy depends.”

The economy is in crisis and is worsening as I type. The media is making a desperate attempt to convince us that everything is under control and things are getting better. While they are carrying out their orders, we faithfully “eat” their feed and remain loyal to our so-called life styles. We browse the malls, dine in fine restaurants, pay high bucks to watch a new movie, lease luxury cars, sweat in spas and casinos, and look forward to the gilded age that they tell us is coming soon.

The “relentless search for novelty and status locks us into an iron cage of consumerism,” writes Tim Jackson, the author of Prosperity without Growth. Consumerism is a game we can’t seem to stop playing: TiVo says buy, and we happily comply!  Wide-eyed, we run to the store and start a chain reaction that swallows us in the end.  So we are building a heap that will eventually bury us under.

For thousands of years humanity has developed grounded on the basic necessities.  The majority always has and continues to live without luxuries.  Even clothes used to be passed down from generation to generation, as they still are.  But just a century old feast of highly evolved “cockroaches”—the phenomenon of the modern era— has practically ruined the planet.  Like it or not, we will have to put an end to it.

Kalle Lasn, the co-founder of Adbusters Media Foundation, agrees: “Our headlong plunge into ecological collapse requires a profound shift in the way we see things. Driving hybrid cars and limiting industrial emissions is great, but they are band-aid solutions if we don’t address the core problem: we have to consume less.”

Industry was previously based on the “money-commodity-money” paradigm.  But today, this model has lost the commodity element:  we sell and buy money.  That is what our “trade” has become:  we exchange paper.  The two remaining valuable commodities lie in the area of basic necessity.  We need shelter and sustenance, and a certainty that they won’t be taken from us today or tomorrow.  But one thing we need to understand is that luxuries are being cancelled.

Modern manufacturing hardly produces anything valuable anymore while still continuing to drain natural resources.  We buy and exchange meaningless things that are passing from hands to hands until they reach their ultimate destination – the omnivorous trashcan, and the wastelands are ever expanding. Except for a few staples that we all need, everything else is merely toys. Are we willing to ruin the Earth for them?

The money-printing machine never sleeps, since the owners do not wish consumption to stop. Yet, reality follows its own, specific agenda, and it could care less for what we think we want. Once it hits, it does so with absolute clarity – to get the point across. Remarkably, when we see the hammer raised over our head, we don’t try to catch it – instead, we think how to bribe it and avoid the pain. As if it is something to bargain with.

In fact, we are practicing an “ostrich strategy” – when in fear, stick your head in the sand. It won’t work this time. The problem is not going away, no matter how “ostrich” we get.

We know that most of the existing industry and all legislative and financial institutions are driven by the illusion of ultimate prosperity.  These parasites sustain themselves by sucking the consumer’s  income and claiming ownership to natural resources that are being rapidly drained. And we readily offer our wallets, because we have been trained to believe that wealth equals happiness and material things bring satisfaction. We are addicted to new products, services, brands – more and more stuff.

The planet is on the edge, and it’s is time to ask ourselves – what on earth are we thinking?

Tomas L. Friedman, of the New York Times, agrees:  “You really do have to wonder whether a few years from now we’ll look back at the first decade of the 21st century — when food prices spiked, energy prices soared, world population surged, tornadoes plowed through cities, floods and droughts set records, populations were displaced and governments were threatened by the confluence of it all — and ask ourselves: What were we thinking? How is it that we did we not panic when the evidence was so obvious that we had crossed some growth, climate, natural resource, population redlines all at once?

The economic-ecological crisis we are living in today is here to demonstrate that we cannot keep taking more than we actually need.  We may not wish to accept this truth, but Nature is forcing us to, and we will, whether we like it or not. “What is certain is that, as a species, we have reached a point at which we no longer have a choice between being radical and being realistic; the two attributes have become one and the same.” (Victor Wallis, Economic/Ecological Crisis and Conversion)

No matter how difficult it is, it’s time to change our view of life. We are destroying vital reserves, consuming our own future.  We exploit natural resources and pollute the earth with our waste to an extent that exceeds the planet’s capacity for self-restoration.

Since we are unable to change ourselves at will and growth of awareness takes time, we will most likely be reformed by the crisis – quickly and radically.  Over the course of the next few decades, we will have completely reformed economy, power and transportation industries.  The vital difference in how we are going to accomplish it lies in whether we’ll do it by conscious choice or forced into consciousness by Nature.

To avoid the latter, we should use all our mental power to make an effort to realize that the “happiness” paradigm aimed at consumption is corrupted and will never fulfill our desires, and that it is time to move on to the paradigm aimed at true happiness, where people will spend less time working and striving for accumulation of things and instead, use that time for something really meaningful—the fulfillment of their inner capacities.

We are facing a choice that the crisis dictates:  we will either end in a total collapse or create a new, stable model of economy.  And we will definitely choose the second, for we may be slow starters, but we are not idiots.

 



Together We Can Change the World

To change the world together – sound like a great idea! But the world changes through us, people who live in it; therefore, we must understand how the world is currently changing and what we wish it to be. By changing ourselves to become an integral part of the entire system called Universe, we change the world. Nature has always driven us forward. We thought that we were changing the world, but in reality, we were simply pushed toward trying to reach happiness and more happiness or run from misfortunes and suffering. And ultimately, we have come to such a condition where we improve the world only by improving ourselves with our awareness, a rational understanding of nature, and with our connection and balance with it.

 

 

Of Unity

By Mark Berelekhis

I offer thanks to Jobs and Gates

for helping me erect

a thousand shiny screens

between me and the world,

a neighbor’s icy gaze,

another human heart.

Encased in an impregnable cocoon–

coasting on hashtags,

bouncing off Facebook walls–

I toil from dawn till dusk

to sow and harvest the illusion

of connection.

What do I know of unity?

A transient alliance

against a rival sports team,

against an ideology,

against the one percent.

Discordance makes a flimsy foundation–

values shift, teams relocate, fortunes are lost

or gained.

The lens inside my skull is on the fritz,

capturing stills of enmity and strife,

where there is only love.

But this, alas, is all I know of life.

 

The Ego and Public Feedback

When we examine nature and human behavior, we discover that it is driven by ego, which cares about only two things: feeling pleasure and avoiding pain. If we examine ourselves closely, we will realize that apart for basic necessities, we inherit all desires from the society we live in: what we eat, how we dress, the jobs we choose, the goods we covet, and our attitudes toward the rest of the world. We acquire our preferences from those whom we are taught to respect and admire.

 

Moreover, once our basic needs are secured, some develop a desire to rule over others and take advantage of them. Once we determine what we want, we start looking for ways to get what we want. This is why we are so dependent on the society – it is a supplier of our desires and the means to satisfy them.

For this reason, if we build a society that values cooperation and compassion for others, we will avoid selfishness, over-consumption, and pursuit of fame, fortune, and power in order to gain others’ recognition and approval.

One way or the other, the ego demands connection with the society while envisioning itself as the ruler. But society can “implant” us with the opposite values, without shattering the ego: Do be great, be proud, be all you can be and more! But do it in a constructive way rather than destructive.

In other words, the ego, which is used to gaining personal benefit at the expense of others, can gradually be transformed – through the influence of the environment, the society we are in.

Picture a person running for office. What are his or her objectives? To be in power, to prove that they know best! They want to run the government, make new laws, and establish a new order. Yet, what do they say to the public? Something along the lines “I will serve everyone, work for the common good; I will treat you all as my own family.”

 

This is an example of how one’s connection with the society compels a person to show an altruistic attitude, even if it is mere words,  prompted by noting but egoistic intentions and strife for personal gain. Imagine what we could achieve if society could, in fact, induce altruistic attitudes within us, rather than empty words! 

 

 

When candidates running for office make promises—“I will create jobs,” “I will provide housing, financial security,” and so on—the society must hold them accountable. If candidates wish to be elected, they must know that they are expected to be accountable for the promises they made. In return, the people will value and recognize their leadership. They will gain respect, power, and social approbation according to their efforts to serve their constituencies.

Likewise, we need not complain, blame, or demand someone to change since it is pointless and unrealistic. Instead, we can influence a person (be it a leader or not) indirectly, through public feedback, into gladly accepting the assigned responsibilities and following through on them.

Such an approach would create an encouraging environment for a person to adapt behaviors in accord with the nature of society, just as a plant grows and acts in accord with the temperature, moisture, atmospheric pressure, and other conditions in its environment. Moreover, the process itself would be enjoyable and rewarding, just as a child enjoys playing with others and learning at the same time.

 

Internal Enemy

We have always been egoistically pushed forward by nature; we have always followed it blindly; in other words, we were instinctively pushed forward by our desire to keep fulfilling ourselves, and as it kept manifesting in us, we strove towards wealth, fame, power, knowledge—anything at all.

As a result, we have reached certain satiety, and our egoism has come to a dead end; we cannot even say that it keeps growing. On one hand, there is a certain line of reevaluation of our values: “Is it right to continue to strive towards the attainment of fame, knowledge, wealth, and power? Is this the meaning of our development?”

On the other hand, we see that our dependence on each other forces us to introduce some other international economic formulas, which must take our interdependence into consideration, in other words, if I will suffer, you will also suffer, no matter how egoistic it now appears to be. Even today, I still try to build my happiness on the suppression of others, base my power on being stronger than others, and by collecting more.

We must take the integration of the world into consideration. And if we do not correspond to this integration, we will not be able to understand the way we are supposed to advance in accordance with the world and nature. Today we feel nature’s challenge, its pressure on us with the only purpose of making us gradually begin to change ourselves to become like it. This has never happened before.

If we were to look at it from an ontological perspective, we would see that nature has always pushed us towards egoistic development. And now, on the contrary, it is showing us that egoistic development has come to an end; in other words, we have completed our development of the still, vegetative, and animate levels, when we were instinctively pushed forward by nature; this is why this level of human development is called animate.

But now we must begin developing on the “human” level, when we understand and perceive the surrounding world to the point of changing ourselves to suit it. Neither the world nor nature are forcing us to change instinctively, evoking these desires in us, which forced us to build a society, economy, technology, etc.: This no longer exists today.